Journal of Cyber Law (JOCL)

Journal of Cyber Law (JOCL)

An Analysis of the Legal Dimensions and Legislative Gaps in Iran’s Industrial Wastewater Reuse System, with a Focus on General and Specific Environmental Laws

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Environmental Management, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Law, TS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Environmental Management,SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Environmental Engineering, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The escalating water scarcity crisis in Iran, a country located within the world’s arid and semi-arid belt, has exposed the sustainability of social life and the trajectory of industrial development to unprecedented threats (Shiklomanov, 1997; UNEP/GEMS, 1995). Given the significant decline in conventional water reserves and the widespread land subsidence across the country’s plains, transitioning from a linear, disposal-oriented paradigm toward circular water economy models and the utilization of unconventional water resources has become imperative (White & Case, 2023). The reuse of industrial wastewater is framed not only as an environmental necessity for preventing the contamination of vital water resources but also as a strategic asset for achieving sustainable industrial development (Mihai & Minea, 2021; Smol, 2023). The objective of this comprehensive scientific research is to critically examine Iran’s legal framework and identify legislative and structural gaps as well as overlapping institutional jurisdictions in the field of industrial wastewater reuse.
Adopting a descriptive-analytical approach and documentary (library-based) research method, this study comprehensively examines Iran’s documentary corpus, including the Constitution, general and specific laws, regulations, technical guidelines, and upstream policy documents of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The legal assessment and analysis of legislative texts are based on four main indicators: “clarity of the ownership regime,” “separation of administrative jurisdictions,” “effectiveness of enforcement mechanisms,” and “compatibility with modern monitoring and treatment technologies.” Furthermore, in order to develop a context-specific and effective model, the experiences and legal frameworks of leading countries, including Spain, South Korea, Japan, and Türkiye, are comparatively examined (Act on Promotion and Support of Water Reuse, 2010; Royal Decree 1085/2024; Water Cycle Basic Act, 2014).
An examination of Iran’s legal system reveals that the country’s legal framework remains dominated by the traditional disposal-oriented paradigm and lacks specific and coherent legislation governing wastewater reuse (Bahrami et al., 2023; Salehi Arjmand et al., 2003). Major structural legislative gaps identified include profound ambiguity regarding the ownership regime of raw and treated wastewater; the absence of long-term contractual frameworks, such as Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) and Public-Private Partnership (PPP) models; the ineffectiveness and lack of deterrence of environmental fines in comparison with the substantial costs of advanced treatment; and the lack of legal recognition of digital evidence generated by online monitoring systems in judicial proceedings (Fair Water Distribution Law, 1982; Waste Management Law, 2004). At the institutional level, overlapping responsibilities and structural conflicts of interest within the Ministry of Energy constitute a major obstacle to the development of an efficient wastewater market.
Achieving industrial sustainability in Iran requires a fundamental transformation in the legal perspective, shifting from a discharge-oriented approach toward a utilization-oriented approach (Smol, 2023; World Bank, 2023). Drawing on international experiences, this study proposes the formulation and enactment of a “Comprehensive Industrial Wastewater Reuse Law in Iran.” Such legislation should clarify the ownership regime of wastewater, establish an independent cross-sectoral regulatory body to address jurisdictional overlaps, introduce economic incentives such as tax credits, and institutionalize closed-loop and sustainable industrial hydrological cycles by upgrading technical standards to risk-based biological safety criteria grounded in Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) (Mulas et al., 2025; Royal Decree 1085/2024).
Keywords
Subjects

آیین‌نامه جلوگیری از آلودگی آب. (۱۳۷۳). مصوب هیئت وزیران به استناد ماده ۴۶ قانون توزیع عادلانه آب.
بهرامی، ا.، احدی، ف.، بهرامی، م.، و آقامیرمحمدعلی، ف. س. (۱۴۰۲). ارزیابی کیفی پساب خروجی تصفیه‌خانه فاضلاب شهری شیراز برای مصارف مختلف. فصلنامه علوم محیطی، ۲۱(۲)، ۲۹-۴۸.
پورحبیب، ی. (۱۳۹۹). امکان‌سنجی استفاده مجدد از پساب تصفیه‌خانه فاضلاب شهر خلخال جهت مصارف کشاورزی. دومین سمینار ملی جایگاه آب‌های بازیافتی و پساب در مدیریت منابع آب، تهران.
حضرتی، م.، و جعفرزاده حقیقی فرد، ن. (۱۴۰۳). بررسی انتشار میکروپلاستیک‌ها از طریق تصفیه‌خانه‌های فاضلاب استان اردبیل. هشتمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی ایمنی و بهداشت، تهران.
صالحی ارجمند، ح.، مهدیان، م. ح.، کارگری، آ.، و مهدیه، م. (۱۳۸۲). مطالعه امکان‌سنجی استفاده مجدد از پساب تصفیه‌خانه فاضلاب اراک. مجله محیط زیست و مهندسی آب، ۶۵، ۳۹-۴۶.
قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. (۱۳۵۸). مصوب مجلس بررسی نهایی قانون اساسی (اصول ۴۵، ۴۸ و ۵۰).
قانون برنامه پنج‌ساله هفتم پیشرفت جمهوری اسلامی ایران. (۱۴۰۳). مصوب مجلس شورای اسلامی (مواد ۳۹ و ۴۱).
قانون توزیع عادلانه آب. (۱۳۶۱). مصوب مجلس شورای اسلامی (ماده ۲۴).
قانون حفاظت و بهسازی محیط زیست. (۱۳۵۳). مصوب مجلس شورای ملی (با اصلاحات ۱۳۷۱).
قانون مدیریت پسماندها. (۱۳۸۳). مصوب مجلس شورای اسلامی (ماده ۲).
قربانی، ا.، عباسی مقدم، ح.، و عبدالهی، م. (۱۳۹۳). امکان‌سنجی استفاده مجدد از فاضلاب شهرک صنعتی توس برای آبیاری فضای سبز و کشاورزی. هفتمین همایش ملی و نمایشگاه تخصصی مهندسی محیط زیست، تهران.
گلی نسب، م.، و کریمی، س. (۱۳۹۳). بررسی روش‌های ارتقای کیفیت پساب تصفیه‌خانه فاضلاب شهر اراک در دفع به آب‌های سطحی. دومین همایش ملی بازیافت آب، تهران.
Act on Promotion and Support of Water Reuse. (2010). Act No. 10359, South Korea (Amended 2024).
Aguado García, D., Haimi, H., Mulas, M., & Corona, F. (2018). Roadmap towards smart wastewater treatment facilities. Aalto University Publications.
Angelakis, A. N., & Gikas, P. (2014). Water reuse: From ancient to modern times and the future. European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 8, 67-78.
Langone, M. (2022). Circular economy in waste and wastewaters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 12781.
Lundin, M., Bengtsson, M., & Molander, S. (2000). Life Cycle Assessment of Wastewater Systems: Influence of System Boundaries and Scale on Calculated Environmental Loads. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(1), 180-186.
Mihai, F. C., & Minea, I. (2021). Sustainable Alternative Routes versus Linear Economy and Resources Degradation in Eastern Romania. Sustainability, 13(19), 1-23.
Neto, O. B. L., Mulas, M., Harjunkoski, I., & Corona, F. (2025). Predictive control of wastewater treatment plants as energy-autonomous water resource recovery facilities. Journal of Process Control, arXiv:2506.10490.
Royal Decree 1085/2024. (2024). BOE-A-2024-21650, Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge, Spain.
Smol, M. (2023). Circular Economy in Wastewater Treatment Plant—Water, Energy and Raw Materials Recovery. Energies, 16(9), 1-18.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2022). Multi-Agency Water Reuse Programs: Lessons for Successful Collaboration. Washington, DC: EPA.
White & Case. (2023). New era of water reuse and reclamation: Opportunities and challenges. London: White & Case Publications.
World Bank. (2023). Closing the Loop: Wastewater Reuse, Economics, and Market-Based Incentives. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.